like a big lump of i-cord

the-picture-of-dorian-gay:

this is what i’ve been doing for the past 4 hours. i’m a damn idiot. a design for a cross stitch. im fucking cute. free to use, for all ur feminist/cross stitch/bee needs. (╯◕_◕)╯

the-picture-of-dorian-gay:

this is what i’ve been doing for the past 4 hours. i’m a damn idiot. a design for a cross stitch. im fucking cute. free to use, for all ur feminist/cross stitch/bee needs. (╯◕_◕)╯

Posted on 22 July, 2014
Reblogged from the-picture-of-dorian-gay  

Posted on 21 July, 2014
Reblogged from fantasticcatadventures  Source crossbeams

"13. Omit needless words.

Vigorous writing is concise. A sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a paragraph no unnecessary sentences, for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines and a machine no unnecessary parts. This requires not that the writer make all his sentences short, or that he avoid all detail and treat his subjects only in outline, but that every word tell."

—  

William Strunk, The Elements of Style

Yooo I don’t get asked for writing advice very much but if you asked me, this would be the thing.

(via lazulisong)

Posted on 21 July, 2014
Reblogged from lazulisong  

kateordie:

ssoja:

I’m very very late ! ê___ê’

Here some pics of my children book”The little Red Wolf” ! :>

Now available in french bookstore and on amazon (the picture of the book on amazon is very very ugly but the book look really better for real…ù__ù) !

This looks amazing!!

Posted on 20 July, 2014
Reblogged from kateordie  Source ssoja

prismatoid:

Life is full of difficult decisions. 

prismatoid:

Life is full of difficult decisions. 

Posted on 20 July, 2014
Reblogged from fantasticcatadventures  Source prismatoid

itswalky:

Shortpacked!: Benny

itswalky:

Shortpacked!: Benny

Posted on 19 July, 2014
Reblogged from itswalky  

pdl2h:

私、怒っています - そんなあなたに

Posted on 18 July, 2014
Reblogged from kellysue  Source snnantn.blog115.fc2.com

"

Recently, my husband and I burned through S1 of Orphan Black, which, as promised by virtually the entire internet, was awesome. But in all the praise I’d seen for it, a line from one review in particular stuck in my mind. The reviewer noted that, although the protagonist, Sarah, is an unlikeable character, her grifter skills make her perfectly suited to unravelling the mystery in which she finds herself. And as this was a positive review, I kept that quote in mind when we started watching, sort of by way of prewarning myself: you maybe won’t like Sarah, but that’s OK.

But here’s the thing: I fucking loved Sarah. I mean, I get what the reviewer was trying to say, in that she’s not always a sympathetic character, but that’s not the same as her actually being unlikeable. And the more I watched, the more I found myself thinking: why is this quality, the idea of likeability, considered so important for women, but so optional for men – not just in real life, but in narrative? Because when it comes to guys, we have whole fandoms bending over backwards to write soulful meta humanising male characters whose actions, regardless of their motives, are far less complex than monstrous. We take male villains and redeem them a hundred, a thousand times over – men who are murderers, stalkers, abusers, kinslayers, traitors, attempted or successful rapists; men with personal histories so bloody and tortured, it’s like looking at a battlefield. In doing this, we exhibit enormous compassion for and understanding of the nuances of human behaviour – sympathy for circumstance, for context, for motive and character and passion and rage, the heartache and, to steal a phrase, the thousand natural shocks that flesh is heir to; and as such, regardless of how I might feel about the practice as applied in specific instances, in general, it’s a praiseworthy endeavour. It helps us to see human beings, not as wholly black and white, but as flawed and complicated creatures, and we need to do that, because it’s what we are.

But when it comes to women, a single selfish or not-nice act – a stolen kiss, a lie, a brushoff – is somehow enough to see them condemned as whores and bitches forever. We readily excuse our favourite male characters of murder, but if a woman politely turns down a date with someone she has no interest in, she’s a timewasting user bimbo and god, what does he even see in her? Don’t get me wrong, I’ve seen some great online meta about, for instance, the soulfulness and moral ambiguity of Black Widow, but I’ve also seen a metric fucktonne more about what that particular jaw-spasm means in that one GIF of Cumberbatch/Ackles/Hiddleston/Smith alone, and that’s before you get into the pages-long pieces about why Rumplestiltskin or Hook or Spike or Bucky Barnes or whoever is really just a tortured woobie who needs a hug. Hell, I’m guilty of writing some of that stuff myself, because see above: plus, it’s meaty and fun and exactly the kind of analysis I like to write.

And yet, we tend overwhelmingly not to write it about ladies. It’s not just our cultural obsession with pushing increasingly specific variants of the Madonna/Whore complex onto women, such that audiences are disinclined to extend to female characters the same moral/emotional licenses they extend to men; it’s also a failure to create narratives where the women aren’t just flawed, but where the audience is still encouraged to like them when they are.

Returning to Orphan Black, for instance, if Sarah were male, he’d be unequivocally viewed as either a complex, sympathetic antihero or a loving battler with a heart of gold. I mean, the ex-con trying to go straight and get his daughter back while still battling the illegalities of his old life and punching bad guys? Let me introduce you to Swordfish, Death Race, and about a millionty other stories where a father’s separation from a beloved child, whether as a consequence of his actual criminal actions, shiftless neglect, sheer bad luck or a combination of all three, is never couched as a reason why he might not be a fit parent. We tend to accept, both culturally and narratively, that men who abandon their children aren’t automatically bad dads; they just have other, important things to be doing first, like coming to terms with parenthood, saving the world, escaping from prison or otherwise getting their shit together. But Sarah, who left her child in the care of someone she trusted absolutely, has to jump through hoops to prove her maternal readiness on returning; has to answer for her absence over and over again. And on one level, that’s fine; that’s as it should be, because Sarah’s life is dangerous. And yet, her situation stands in glaring contrast to every returning father who’s never been asked to do half so much, because women aren’t meant to struggle with motherhood, to have to try to succeed: we’re either maternal angels or selfish absentees, and the idea that we might sometimes be both or neither isn’t one you often see depicted with such nuance.

"

—  

Gender, Orphan Black & The Meta Of Meta

read this, read it right now it’s absolutely genius.

(via sarahcosima)

Tagged #orphan black  #sarah manning  

Posted on 16 July, 2014
Reblogged from nightrevelations  Source knowlesian

bedsafely:

whitachi:

I have been lead to believe tumblr support and abuse reporting is basically useless, but if anyone else would like to report this, that’d be lovely.

please report this bullshit.

Posted on 16 July, 2014
Reblogged from bedsafely  Source whitachi

topatoco:

NEW PRODUCTS POST?! WOW-EEE TOPATOCO FANS!

We have so many amazing products, like that birb shirt and the bat ladee print by John Allison (Bad Machinery)!!!

Also some neato stuff that Jeph Jacques (Questionable Content) made.

Can’t forget that coyote keychain either, by Tom Siddell (Gunnerkrigg Court)!!!

SO GO BUY THE SWEET NEW PRODUCTS YOU GUYS! IS CAPS LOCK BROKEN FOR ANYBODY ELSE??

I know several people who need that Too Tall shirt.

Posted on 15 July, 2014
Reblogged from topatoco  


Vivid Theme by JoachimT
Powered by Tumblr

Install Theme